-
Part 2 | Session 4 TRILUMINATE Pivotal Trial: Lessons Learned from Tricuspid TEER
-
Part 2 | Session 5 Real-World EVOQUE Outcomes from TVT Registry
-
Part 2 | Session 6 PASCAL Precision System in Complex Degenerative MR
-
Part 2 | Session 7 PREVUE-VALVE: Prevalence of Valvular Heart Disease in Older Americans
-
Part 2 | Session 9 Short-CUT: Lithotripsy Vs Cutting Balloon for CAD
-
Part 2 | Session 10 10-Year Mortality in NOBLE: PCI vs CABG for Left Main Disease
-
Part 2 | Session 11 1-Year ENCIRCLE TMVR Results with SAPIEN M3
-
Part 1 | Session 1 5 Trials That Will Change My Practice with Dr Mirvat Alasnag
-
Part 1 | Session 2 2 Trials That Will Change My Practice with Prof Rasha Al-Lamee
-
Part 1 | Session 3 3 Ways AI Will Change Your Practice
-
Part 1 | Session 4 TCT 25 Structural Interventions Highlights
TCT 2025 — Prof Christian M Spaulding (European Hospital Georges Pompidou & INSERM U 970, FR), principal investigator of the SELUTION DeNovo trial (M.A. Med Alliance S.A.; NCT04859985), joins us to share the one year results.
This international, multicentre randomised trial enrolled over 3,300 patients at 50 sites across Europe and Asia to compare a sirolimus-eluting balloon (SEB) plus provisional DES strategy with routine DES implantation in de novo coronary lesions. Eligible patients had PCI-indicated lesions 2–5 mm in diameter and presented with chronic coronary syndrome, unstable angina, or NSTEMI. The study tests non-inferiority for target vessel failure (TVF) at 12 months and 5 years, with planned long-term follow-up to evaluate safety and clinical outcomes.
Investigators at one year reached non-inferiority with 5.5% target vessel failure rate in the SEB strategy group, 4.5% in the DES strategy group and this difference is significant with a P value of 0.02.
Interview Questions:
1. Can you briefly outline the design and rationale of the study?
2. What were the inclusion criteria, lesion characteristics, and patient demographics that define the enrolled population?
3. What were the key one-year clinical outcomes of the two PCI strategies?
4. How often was provisional stenting used, and did any subgroups differ?
5. What do these results mean for practice, and what’s next for follow-up?
For more content from TCT 2025 head to the Late-breaking Science Video Collection.
Interviewer: Mirjam Boros
Video Editor: David Ben-Harosh
Support: This is an independent interview produced by Radcliffe Cardiology.
Stay Updated with Our TCT 2025 Video Coverage
We’re bringing you independent, critical insights straight from TCT 2025.
Join Prof Nicolas Van Mieghem in Cardiology Conference Perspectives as he discusses what the late-breaking data could mean for your practice.
Don’t miss our short Expert Interviews with investigators, offering concise analyses and practical take-home messages.
Hear Dr Mirvat Alasnag and Dr Rasha Al-Lamee share their views on the data they believe will have the greatest impact on clinical practice.
Follow the hot topics driving innovation in interventional cardiology, and stay tuned for fresh perspectives, real-world insights and global viewpoints, all coming soon on Transcatheter Academy.
More from this programme
Part 1
Highlights
Part 2
Expert Interviews
Part 3
NVM Cardiology Conference Perspectives
A focused video series where Prof Nicolas Van Mieghem offers expert reflections on the most impactful late-breaking trials shaping interventional cardiology at TCT 2025.
Faculty Biographies
Christian Spaulding
Professor of Cardiology
Christian Spaulding is a Professor of Cardiology and Interventional Cardiologist at the European Hospital Georges Pompidou and Université Paris Cité in Paris, France. He heads the hospital’s catheterisation laboratory and has over 20 years of experience in interventional cardiology, clinical care, and teaching medical students, residents, and fellows.
From June 2010 to December 2011, he served as Worldwide Head of Medical Affairs for Cordis, Johnson & Johnson. His expertise includes the management of clinical trials, investigator-initiated trials, business development, and strategic planning.
Comments